近日(ri)，國(guo)(guo)(guo)內(nei)首例(li)(li)定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)制(zhi)(zhi)家(jia)(jia)(jia)具(ju)(ju)行(xing)業(ye)(ye)(ye)著(zhu)作(zuo)(zuo)權案——左尚(shang)(shang)明舍(she)訴北京中融恒盛(sheng)(sheng)木業(ye)(ye)(ye)有(you)(you)限公司及其(qi)(qi)(qi)南京夢(meng)陽銷售中心，抄襲仿冒(mao)“唐(tang)韻衣帽間”一案，江(jiang)蘇(su)省高(gao)院(yuan)做出終(zhong)審(shen)(shen)判(pan)決。左尚(shang)(shang)明舍(she)維權成功。 左尚(shang)(shang)明舍(she)2007年創立(li)于上(shang)海，是(shi)(shi)較早進入(ru)定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)制(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)業(ye)(ye)(ye)的(de)品牌(pai)。“唐(tang)韻”是(shi)(shi)其(qi)(qi)(qi)經(jing)典(dian)產品之一，開定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)制(zhi)(zhi)家(jia)(jia)(jia)具(ju)(ju)新中式風格先河。在(zai)其(qi)(qi)(qi)全(quan)國(guo)(guo)(guo)多家(jia)(jia)(jia)專賣店，均做重點(dian)展(zhan)示，業(ye)(ye)(ye)內(nei)人士(shi)對(dui)其(qi)(qi)(qi)印象頗(po)深(shen)(shen)。 “唐(tang)韻”的(de)知名度，也(ye)是(shi)(shi)此次著(zhu)作(zuo)(zuo)權糾紛案從(cong)立(li)案伊始，便受到業(ye)(ye)(ye)內(nei)關注(zhu)的(de)原因之一。在(zai)案件的(de)審(shen)(shen)理過(guo)程中，觀(guan)望者(zhe)(zhe)，心態各(ge)異。“定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)制(zhi)(zhi)家(jia)(jia)(jia)具(ju)(ju)的(de)外(wai)觀(guan)設計，是(shi)(shi)否受我國(guo)(guo)(guo)法律保護(hu)？”江(jiang)蘇(su)省高(gao)院(yuan)的(de)終(zhong)審(shen)(shen)判(pan)決，給出了(le)權威答復：認(ren)定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)北京中融恒盛(sheng)(sheng)木業(ye)(ye)(ye)侵權成立(li)；并認(ren)定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)制(zhi)(zhi)家(jia)(jia)(jia)具(ju)(ju)可作(zuo)(zuo)為實用藝(yi)術品通過(guo)著(zhu)作(zuo)(zuo)權進行(xing)保護(hu)。 國(guo)(guo)(guo)內(nei)首例(li)(li)定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)制(zhi)(zhi)家(jia)(jia)(jia)具(ju)(ju)行(xing)業(ye)(ye)(ye)著(zhu)作(zuo)(zuo)權案——左尚(shang)(shang)明舍(she)維權成功。此案，讓定(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)(ding)制(zhi)(zhi)家(jia)(jia)(jia)具(ju)(ju)行(xing)業(ye)(ye)(ye)對(dui)著(zhu)作(zuo)(zuo)權的(de)保護(hu)有(you)(you)了(le)更深(shen)(shen)刻的(de)認(ren)識。也(ye)讓后續維權者(zhe)(zhe)，可以(yi)有(you)(you)例(li)(li)可循，在(zai)國(guo)(guo)(guo)內(nei)頗(po)具(ju)(ju)典(dian)型意義